In his book, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, writer and columnist Thomas L. Friedman discusses the “straightening” of world, in which individuals from one side of the planet to the other have been conceded progressively equivalent admittance to normal assets, innovation, markets, and so forth. Agreeing the Friedman, this had started to foster all through the last option part of the earlier hundred years, when globalization went off in a few strange directions. In the level world business, partnerships, work, data and try and culture have gone through revolutionary changes. Neither created not agricultural nations have stayed immaculate. Friedman then, at that point, contends that understanding how the level world functions is significant to making progress. He isn’t simply alluding to the universe of business, yet additionally to proficient turn of events and tracking down answers for a large number of our well established issues, like neediness and disparity.
Fascinating, enlightening and simple to peruse, the book is really interesting. Lentor Modern Despite the fact that Friedman utilizes IT and business language every once in a while, he puts forth a legit attempt to assist less educated perusers with understanding by introducing numerous genuine instances of how adjusting to the level world can significantly help of all shapes and sizes organizations, people and even legislatures.
A portion of the Book’s Fascinating Topics
Albeit The World Is Flat discussions about such countless organizations, people and peculiarities, there were a not many that especially grabbed my attention:
1. Business Process Outsourcing (BPOs) improving financial circumstances in India
2. WalMart’s best in class worldwide stock framework
3. IT organizations in the third world as an option in contrast to noble cause
4. Global organizations as obstacles of war
5. State/government changes important for globalizing a country
Despite the fact that Friedman presents thoroughly examined contentions,
As great as the book might be, notwithstanding, I actually have a few doubts about it. As far as one might be concerned, Friedman is clearly favorable to American. While this is totally reasonable on an individual level, it removes some validity from his contentions, which are generally very evenhanded. One example where this is clear is the point at which he resolves the inquiry, What will happen to the world’s restricted assets on the off chance that the world truly does go level (everyone consumes similar measure of assets)? He misses the mark concerning truly moving first-world customers to consume less, which I see as very disheartening.
In any case, The World Is Flat is an extremely enlightening, pragmatic and captivating book, and I generously suggest it for any sort of peruser.
There are such countless incredible books out there, thus brief period to understand them! Assuming you’re searching for surveys on supportive materials, visit my blog, CROSSviews. Here you’ll find my unique survey of The World Is Flat and other helpful assets.